Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
You know that sections 111, 119 are priced more than 112-118? That 127 is more than 112?

That 111 and 119 are priced the same as 219, 220? And that the upper part of 110 are the same as upper 105 and all of 104?

So, in conclusion, supporter's prices are already different based on vantage points. Some "supporters" sections are priced the same as non-supporters in other areas of the stadium.

Nowhere in this idea to make 109-105 standing sections at the top is the provision that they MUST be priced the same as 112. You could charge more based on the vantage point but less than you'd charge for a seat nearer the action (lower row).

Riddle me this, which sections go relatively unsold for CCL games?

What's 100% of $0?

Lower the price, encourage the atmosphere and they might sell more tickets and re-establish their wait list.

TFC already charge in the top 3 for seats all over the stadium, including the most expensive seats in the league (2010) for behind the goal seats in the North End.

Pricing needs an overhaul... despite your suggestion that it is the worst idea ever.
Yes pricing needs an overhaul. Not sure what that has to do with your idea of putting supporters right behind the suits. Your idea isn't to simply drop prices. Your idea is to get MLSE to give supporter's some of the best seats in the house at supporter pricing. Good luck with that. I can't imagine who would sit in the south if they can sit in the best seats in the house for similar pricing.